Listen to this article:
In recent years, numerous studies and surveys have pointed to a trend: individuals identifying as liberal, particularly those who lean far-left, report higher rates of mental health issues compared to their conservative counterparts. The discussion surrounding this phenomenon is often clouded by assumptions—one of the most persistent being that conservatives underreport their mental health struggles due to stigma. But what if the reality is much simpler? What if people who are predisposed to mental health struggles are more likely to be drawn to liberal ideology? Or, what if certain aspects of more left-leaning views incidentally exacerbate such feelings? This article attempts to take an unbiased, deep dive into the research, the possible explanations, and the implications of these correlations.
The Data: Higher Rates of Mental Illness Among Liberals
A 2020 Pew Research Center study found that 62% of White liberals had been diagnosed with a mental health condition by a medical professional, compared to only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates (Pew, American Trends Panel Wave 64). This trend is particularly pronounced among younger liberals, especially White liberal women. And a study from the General Social Survey also supports these findings, revealing that individuals who identify as “extremely liberal” consistently report poorer mental health than those identifying as moderate or conservative (Psychology Today).
Researchers have hypothesized that the disparity in these figures is likely due to social stigma and underreporting among conservatives, but does the data support that assumption? If the statistics on liberal reporting were accurate, couldn’t we expect them to be more consistent with the numbers of reported mental issues among the general population? To put it another way: If conservatives are underreporting, then we shouldn’t expect to see their numbers significantly below the general population?
Begging the Question? The Assumption That Conservatives Underreport
It’s easy to compare statistics between liberals, conservatives, and moderates. But when we compare those numbers to the population at large, according to data from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), approximately 20.6% of U.S. adults experience some form of mental illness annually (NIMH). This percentage is much closer to the numbers reported by conservatives and moderates than it is to the strikingly higher figures reported by liberals.
The notion that conservatives underreport mental health issues assumes that the data cannot be taken at face value. But this raises a critical question: would researchers make the same assumption if the numbers were reversed? If conservatives were reporting higher rates of mental illness, would the conclusion be that liberals were underreporting due to stigma?
In reality, conservatives tend to exhibit personality traits such as higher conscientiousness and lower neuroticism, which are associated with greater emotional stability (Psychology Today). Moreover, conservative worldviews are often rooted in structure, tradition, and religious belief—factors that have been linked to resilience and mental well-being (Columbia Magazine). The assumption that conservatives must be underreporting, rather than acknowledging that liberals may actually experience more mental health struggles, seems to be a form of confirmation bias rather than objective analysis.
But these data present a critical contradiction to that assumption because, if that were the case, why do conservative and moderate numbers align so closely with the general population, whereas liberals’ numbers are dramatically higher? Rather than assuming underreporting, a more logical hypotheses might be that liberal ideology either attracts individuals predisposed to mental health struggles, or that certain elements of liberal ideology may exacerbate these struggles. On that note, it is very interesting that the percentage of moderates (20%) aligns more closely with the percentage reported among the general population (20.6%).
Why Are Mental Health Struggles More Common Among Liberals?
If we reject the hypothesis that conservatives are simply underreporting their struggles, we must then explore why liberals—especially those on the far left—report higher rates of mental illness. Several key factors may contribute to this trend.
1. A Focus on Negativity and Cynicism
Liberal ideology often emphasizes systemic oppression, historical injustices, and structural inequalities. While it is important to acknowledge societal problems, a worldview that is hyper-focused on negativity can be mentally exhausting. Constantly perceiving the world as an unjust, oppressive place can contribute to anxiety, depression, and hopelessness. The psychological principle of learned helplessness suggests that when people believe they have little control over negative events, they are more likely to experience depression (Psychology Today). A mindset that views society as an inescapable web of oppression may create a sense of helplessness, fueling mental distress.
2. Personality Traits and Emotional Sensitivity
Multiple studies have found that individuals identifying as liberal tend to score higher on neuroticism, a personality trait associated with emotional instability, anxiety, and mood disorders (Psychology Today). Conversely, conservatives tend to score higher on conscientiousness and emotional resilience. The higher neuroticism levels among liberals could explain why they report greater mental health struggles. It also suggests that, rather than political ideology causing mental health issues, individuals predisposed to anxiety and depression may be naturally drawn to leftist thinking, which aligns with their heightened emotional sensitivity.
3. Over-Identification with Victimhood
Many aspects of modern progressive thought encourage individuals to define themselves by their grievances—whether those be related to race, gender, sexuality, or socioeconomic status. While recognizing legitimate struggles is necessary for progress, an overemphasis on victimhood can be psychologically damaging.
The concept of “victimhood culture” has been examined in various psychological studies, suggesting that an overemphasis on personal suffering and externalizing control can adversely affect mental health. This perspective posits that when individuals primarily identify themselves as victims of systemic oppression, they may develop an external locus of control, believing that their circumstances are beyond personal influence. Such a mindset can lead to feelings of helplessness, anxiety, and depression. If one’s entire identity is built upon oppression and systemic injustice, then the perception of personal agency is diminished, leading to chronic stress and feelings of disempowerment.
Research indicates that a victimhood mindset may diminish the perceived importance of individual behavioral choices, fostering an overreliance on external factors such as healthcare policies and medical interventions. This externalization can undermine personal agency and contribute to psychological distress. (PsychologyToday) It would seem that harboring such a worldview fosters resentment, perpetual grievance, and an external locus of control, all of which are associated with poor mental health outcomes.
4. Higher Willingness to Seek Mental Health Diagnoses
One counterargument is that liberals do not necessarily experience more mental health issues, but rather, they are more willing to seek diagnoses. While there may be some truth to this, it does not fully explain the disparity—while liberals often advocate for greater mental health awareness; interestingly, their reported treatment results are poorer. For example, studies show that despite greater mental health awareness, treatment outcomes among liberals are often worse than those of conservatives (Johns Hopkins Public Health). This suggests that awareness alone does not account for the higher prevalence of mental illness among liberals.
One possible reason is that while liberals may be more proactive in seeking mental health diagnoses, their ideological perspective may reinforce anxiety and depressive tendencies rather than alleviating them. Liberal ideology often emphasizes systemic issues and external factors, which can lead to a sense of helplessness if individuals feel powerless to change these conditions. Additionally, while greater awareness encourages people to seek help, the effectiveness of treatment depends not just on access but also on mindset, coping mechanisms, and resilience.
Studies have found that conservatives, who tend to prioritize personal responsibility and individual agency, often have stronger protective factors against long-term mental distress, potentially leading to better treatment outcomes even when they do seek help. This raises an important question: is it possible that treatment approaches need to account for ideological perspectives in order to be more effective?
Breaking the Cycle: Balancing Advocacy with Personal Agency
Many of the systemic issues liberals highlight are real, but addressing them requires both societal change and individual action. However, a winner-take-all mentality on both ends of the political spectrum can contribute to a sense of despair, reinforcing feelings of helplessness. This is especially true if someone is predisposed to such mental and emotional perplexities. Perhaps liberals should focus on maintaining their advocacy while also embracing personal responsibility and individual agency.?
Rather than seeing problems as insurmountable, emphasizing small but meaningful actions may help counteract feelings of powerlessness. By channeling energy into direct community engagement, personal growth, and pragmatic activism, individuals can maintain their core ideals without succumbing to hopelessness. Advocating for systemic change is vital, but focusing on what one can do rather than what one can’t may offer a healthier, more sustainable mindset.